
The success of a maintenance team is directly tied to how well it empowers its frontline workers. When it comes to total productive maintenance (TPM), that includes equipment operators.
Machine operators often spend thousands of hours with an asset, getting to know every inch of it. Because of that, they know things about equipment that will never show up in an OEM manual, like why it needs to start up at half-speed on cold days or the subtle sound that tells them a gearbox is laboring more than it should be.
This is the kind of knowledge that can stop catastrophic failures when they’re still small. But that’s not as common as it should be, mainly because there’s often no easy way for an operator’s observation to trigger the right maintenance action. The problem is not with the knowledge, skill, or intention of the operator, but with a lack of processes and systems that enable operators.
That’s why this guide is designed to give you practical ways to include operators in maintenance. It offers suggestions on how to easily integrate operators into maintenance workflows you probably already have and to remove as much friction as possible for operators so maintenance doesn’t feel like an extra job for them.
Key takeaways
- Operators have valuable knowledge about equipment that can help prevent unplanned downtime, but they need simple processes to turn their observations into action.
- Involving operators in maintenance can improve technician efficiency, data accuracy, compliance, and communication between operations and maintenance, leading to lower costs and more reliable production.
- You don't need a massive TPM initiative to get operators involved in maintenance. Start with simple workflows like CIL, digital maintenance requests, shift handoffs, and downtime tracking.
- Getting operators to participate consistently means making maintenance part of their existing routines, involving them in designing workflows, showing them the impact of their contributions, and getting buy-in from production leadership.
Why should you involve operators in maintenance?
The cost of downtime is rising across industrial operations. In 2025, 31% of maintenance and operations leaders said that downtime costs increased or stayed the same. That number rose to 39% in the 2026 State of Industrial Maintenance report. Of the 16% of teams that said they decreased downtime costs, 51% said it was because of TPM initiatives, the second most effective strategy after improved parts management.
Making maintenance and shared responsibility across a company is one of the best ways to build an efficient operation. And that starts with the people closest to the equipment: operators. There are five main paths that link operator-led and assisted maintenance to cost savings:
- Technician efficiency: Maintenance techs are one of the scarcest resources on the floor. Every issue that pulls them from high-skill work is costly, misallocated labor. When operators can take routine tasks off their plate, like cleaning, inspections, and lubrication, it frees up skilled maintenance technicians for jobs only they can do.
- Earlier detection: Operators know their machines better than anyone else, so siloing them from maintenance often leads to missed issues that end in breakdowns, and a lack of context that hampers technicians when fixing equipment. A disconnect between operators and maintenance almost always means lower production.
- More accurate data: Having one process for capturing data about an asset, and one place to put it for both operations and maintenance, makes it easier to not only capture more information, but more accurate and contextual information. This gives plant and maintenance leadership a solid foundation of data with which to make smarter decisions on everything from parts inventory to CapEx recommendations.
- Improved compliance and less risk: Connecting operators into your compliance process means that maintenance staff spend less time hunting down information and completing repetitive inspection tasks. Audit prep goes from days to minutes and the information is more accurate, which protects against fines and shutdowns.
- Better alignment between operations and maintenance: Shared processes, systems, tasks, and metrics inevitably leads to better communication between operations and maintenance. Because each team’s success is tied to the other’s, it makes conversations about maintenance windows, continuous improvement, and other programs a lot easier.
10 ways to involve operators in maintenance
TPM can get very complex, very quickly. There are lots of different frameworks that spin out into years-long projects. And while total productive maintenance is a continuous program without a real finish line, taking on a project with a seemingly endless scope can be paralyzing.
But that doesn’t have to be the case. You can start by taking small steps forward and incorporating operators into maintenance one workflow at a time. Here are 10 examples and how to kick-start each one:
CIL and other routine maintenance tasks
Simple maintenance work, like cleaning, inspection, and lubrication (CIL), are often tasks operators can often do during their regular shifts. This takes routine work off a technician’s schedule while helping operators spot equipment issues before they become breakdowns. The best way to enable operators to complete these tasks is through clear, step-by-step digital SOPs that include pictures or even short videos. Build the workflow into normal start or end-of-shift routines.
Digital maintenance requests
Operators are often the first to notice equipment problems, but because relaying these issues to maintenance often means stepping away from the machine, they don’t get addressed quickly or at all. Digital maintenance requests give operators a quick way to flag issues so technicians can investigate before they get worse.
Setting up a digital work request form can be as easy as attaching a QR code to an asset or work station that links to the form, which asks for simple information, like the asset, problem, and photo. A digital form also makes it easy to keep operators updated on the status of the issue and their machine.
RCAs
Operators can provide valuable context about what happened before a failure, including unusual sounds, machine behavior, or changes in production conditions. Involve operators in RCA discussions for recurring or costly failures, and make participation easy by using a short, standardized set of questions. Document their observations alongside maintenance findings so the team has a more complete picture of the problem.
Huddles and regular meetings/updates
Short, regular meetings between operations and maintenance help both teams stay aligned on equipment issues, upcoming work, and production priorities. Operators can flag emerging problems, share equipment observations, and provide context that helps maintenance plan work around production. Keep huddles to five or ten minutes, use a shared list of open issues and priorities, and give everyone a clear way to follow up on action items.
Shift handoffs and asset records
Important information about equipment often gets lost between shifts, especially when operators rely on verbal updates or handwritten notes. Involving operators in shift handoffs and asset records helps maintenance teams keep track of recurring issues, equipment performance, and work that still needs attention. Create a digital shift handoff checklist where operators can flag problems, add notes or photos, and review outstanding maintenance issues. Store this information in a shared asset record so anyone can access it.
Audits and compliance records
Give operators a simple way to document compliance work and safety checks to reduce the administrative burden on maintenance teams while making it easier to spot and address compliance gaps. Replace paper forms with standardized digital checklists operators can complete during shifts. Include clear instructions, required fields, and photos where needed, and automatically timestamp and save completed records so they're easy to find when an audit comes around.
Downtime tracking
Operators are usually there when a machine stops and know what happened leading up to a failure. Getting them involved in downtime tracking gives maintenance teams more accurate information to identify recurring failures, prioritize repairs, and prevent lost production. Something as simple as allowing operators to timestamp downtime by changing the asset status to offline in your maintenance software can make a big difference in understanding asset performance and costs. Giving them the ability to document reason codes and contribute voice notes to work orders can also add valuable context.
Creating SOPs
Operators often know the small details that make the difference between an SOP that looks good on paper and one that works on the plant floor. Involving operators in creating and updating SOPs helps capture this knowledge, improve accuracy, and make procedures easier to follow. Ask experienced operators to record short videos of tasks, add photos, or suggest changes to existing instructions. Use these inputs to build digital SOPs that can be reviewed, approved, and updated as processes change.
Onboarding and training
Experienced operators have valuable knowledge about equipment that rarely makes it into training manuals, from common failure signs to tricks for keeping machines running smoothly. Involving them in onboarding helps new hires learn faster and avoid costly mistakes. Make it easy for operators to share their expertise by recording short training videos, contributing to digital training checklists, or demonstrating routine tasks.
Setting condition monitoring thresholds and alerts
Operators often recognize when a machine is behaving abnormally before a sensor triggers an alert. Their experience can help maintenance teams set more accurate condition monitoring thresholds for things like temperature, vibration, pressure, and cycle times. Ask operators to help identify normal operating ranges and the conditions that typically signal a problem. Use this information alongside historical asset data and manufacturer recommendations to refine alert thresholds, reduce false alarms, and trigger maintenance work when readings indicate a potential failure.
What’s in it for operations?: How to ensure adoption for operator-led and operator-assisted maintenance
Operators are already under pressure to meet production targets, maintain quality, and keep equipment running. The last thing they want is another checklist to complete, meeting to attend, or system to learn. If operator-led maintenance feels like more work with little benefit, it won't matter how good your program looks on paper. Adoption will suffer.
That's why it's important to show operators and their managers what's in it for them. Fewer breakdowns mean fewer disruptions to production schedules, less time spent waiting for repairs, and fewer headaches trying to get equipment up and running again. Giving operators a voice in maintenance also means they have more control over the issues that make their jobs harder.
But communicating these benefits is only the first step. You also need to make it easy and worthwhile for operators to participate. Here are four ways to do that:
- Build maintenance into existing routines: Operators shouldn't have to choose between hitting production targets and completing maintenance tasks. Incorporate tasks into existing startup procedures, shift handoffs, or changeovers. The less operators need to change how they work, the easier adoption becomes.
- Give operators a say in the process: Before introducing a new workflow, ask operators what would make it easier to complete. Which tasks can realistically fit into their shifts? What information is difficult to capture? What gets in the way of reporting problems? Use their feedback to design processes they'll actually follow.
- Close the feedback loop: Nothing discourages operators from reporting equipment issues faster than feeling like their concerns disappear into a black hole. Make it easy for them to see when a maintenance request has been reviewed, scheduled, or completed. Share examples of how their observations helped prevent failures or improve equipment performance.
- Get production leadership on board: Operators will naturally prioritize the work their supervisors measure and reward. Work with production managers to agree on maintenance responsibilities, allocate time for tasks, and establish shared goals around equipment reliability. This ensures operators aren't getting conflicting instructions from maintenance and production.
Start small to make operator involvement part of everyday maintenance
Getting operators involved in maintenance doesn't have to mean rolling out a massive TPM program or asking your production team to take on a second job. The best place to start is with one workflow that solves a problem for both maintenance and operations.
Make it easy for operators to participate, give them the tools and information they need, and show them how their contributions make a difference. As those small changes become habits, you can build on them to create a more reliable operation where maintenance and production work together to prevent problems instead of reacting to them.


.webp)

.png)
.webp)