Resources
Blog
PFMEA vs. DFMEA: Key Differences and Importance in Risk Management

PFMEA vs. DFMEA: Key Differences and Importance in Risk Management

Contents

See MaintainX in action

Take a live, one-on-one tour with a product expert to see how MaintainX can help you go paper-free and reduce costly unplanned downtime.
Book a Tour

Manufacturers use FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) to identify the potential ways a failure can occur in their workflows. Of course, this can include a broad range of failures (such as equipment, process, or design failure). This post compares two types of FMEA (PFMEA vs. DFMEA), which help identify process and design failure modes.

First, What Is FMEA?

FMEA is a strategic approach to identify possible failures in a process (manufacturing, assembly, or logistics) or design (of a product or service).

As the American Society for Quality explains:

“Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is a step-by-step approach for identifying all possible failures in a design, a manufacturing or assembly process, or a product or service. It is a common process analysis tool.”

FMEA involves two primary components:

  • Failure modes: The manner or mode in which a process or design might fail. For example, an overworked employee might miss a defect when in charge of inspections.
  • Effects analysis: The consequences of failure. For example, a customer might sue you if a defective product harms them somehow.

DFMEA and PFMEA are types of FMEA. While the DFMEA and PFMEA processes are similar, the inputs and output differ.

“Root-cause problem solving, using approaches such as fault-tree analysis as well as cause-and-effect or failure-modes-and-effects analysis (FMEA), is a fundamental part of any organization’s maintenance and reliability strategy.”
McKinsey

What Is DFMEA?

DFMEA (Design FMEA) is a technique that helps identify and fix design failures. The method is used across industries to minimize the costs associated with design failure, such as product recalls or lawsuits from customers impacted by design failure.

DFMEA involves listing potential failure modes and their potential effects, along with a rating for severity, detection, occurrences, and safety. Then, calculate an RPN.

RPN is the Risk Priority Number, a numeric assessment of risk assigned to a process, or steps in a process, as part of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). A team assigns each failure mode numeric values that quantify the likelihood of occurrence, the likelihood of detection, and severity of impact.”

You should perform DFMEA when you’re still developing the product design. Thinking about potential failure modes during product development helps prevent failures that otherwise could be built directly into the design.

“Solving known problems with known solutions helps you gain a quick return on investment and early wins that can be duplicated across facilities. These small wins also help enhance organizational support from employees—which is critical for any analytics program—and management for continued investment."
Forbes

What Is PFMEA?

PFMEA (Process FMEA) helps analyze process failure modes. In other words, PFMEA helps identify potential failures caused by a process. A PFMEA acts as a living document (physical or digital) created for each process and updated throughout the product’s lifecycle.

In this case, you need to understand the impact of a process breakdown to minimize the effect of failure or avert failure altogether.

Note that you might encounter failure even when you use PFMEA. Otherwise, you wouldn’t need reliability and maintenance managers. However, PFMEA can help minimize the potential for failure. You should review PFMEA when a failure occurs or if there’s a significant change in your equipment, manufacturing environment, and resources.

DFMEA vs. PFMEA: Key Differences

Now that you know the meaning of PFMEA and DFMEA, let’s discuss some key differences between the two:

Parameters DFMEA PFMEA
Purpose The primary purpose of DFMEA is to maintain high product quality. The primary purpose of PFMEA is to ensure the reliability and efficiency of the production process.
Focus DFMEA focuses on identifying potential design problems at the system, subsystem, or component level. PFMEA focuses on identifying potential process problems in manufacturing, assembly, and logistics processes.

APQP Process

 

Phase

DFMEA is part of the 2nd phase of the APQP process. PFMEA is part of the 3rd phase of the APQP process.
Time of Creation DFMEA is created in the early stages of product design. PFMEA is created before planning for tooling and manufacturing development.
Key Inputs

Key inputs for DFMEA include a Block (Boundary) diagram, P chart (Parameter), and bill of materials (BOM).

Key inputs for PFMEA include the output of drawing, DFMEA, and process flow chart.
Next Step You can proceed with the Design Verification Plan and Report (DVP & R), PFMEA, etc., after DMFEA. You can proceed with creating a process control plan.
Assumption DMFEA doesn’t rely on process controls. PFMEA assumes that you have considered potential failures related to product design and only focus on process-related issues.

FMEA vs. PFMEA: The Process

Both types of FMEA follow a process illustrated in the AIAG-VDA FMEA handbook—you can use it as a guide to help develop your product and design failure mode and effects analysis.

The handbook includes best practices developed by a global team of OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) and tier 1 SMEs (subject matter experts). It combines the methodologies of AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group) and VDA (The German Association of Automotive Industry) into a more structured approach.

Here are the steps in the FMEA process according to the AIAG-VGA handbook:

  • Step 1: Planning and preparation
  • Step 2: Structure analysis
  • Step 3: Function analysis
  • Step 4: Failure analysis
  • Step 5: Risk analysis
  • Step 6: Optimization
  • Step 7: Results and documentation

Which Failure Mode Should You Prioritize?

Step 5 of the DFMEA and PFMEA process allows you to determine the failure modes you should address first. You can prioritize failure modes based on severity, frequency, and how easily you can detect the failure modes.

You need to provide a rating for the following factors during FMEA:

  • Severity: How severe will the impact of the system or machine’s failure be?
  • Detection: How likely is the failure to be detected when it becomes a possibility?
  • Occurrences: What’s the probability of failure occurring in a given time frame?
  • Safety: What’s the risk to people and systems if the system or machinery fails?
  • Risk priority number (RPN): RPN is calculated based on severity, occurrences, and detection.RPN = severity x occurrences x detection A lower RPN is desirable. A high RPN denotes high risk.

Once you’ve listed the failure modes and assigned a rating, you need to list the potential cause of failure for each failure mode (using techniques like root cause analysis). Then you need to determine a corrective action to minimize the impact of a failure mode based on its RPN.

When to Use PFMEA and DFMEA

You can use PFMEA or DFMEA in the following situations:

  • You’re about to develop control plans for a process
  • When you apply an existing product or process differently
  • Before introducing a new product, process, step, method, or technology
  • Before implementing a re-engineered manufacturing process
  • During the process as a quality control tool
  • When analyzing failures of an existing process or product

Collect Data to Improve DFMEA and PFMEA Accuracy

A CMMS (computerized maintenance management system) can help collect data required to improve FMEA accuracy. Examples of the type of data CMMS can collect include equipment breakdown history, downtime history, and the cost of repairing an asset each time it failed in the past.

This data can provide valuable insights when assessing and reviewing failure modes. In addition to collecting data, a CMMS streamlines maintenance processes, reducing the risk of failure. With MaintainX, you can track assets, issue work orders, and collaborate using the built-in chat option.

If you’re looking to use FMEA at your facility, try MaintainX today.

FAQs

No items found.
author photo

Caroline Eisner

Caroline Eisner is a writer and editor with experience across the profit and nonprofit sectors, government, education, and financial organizations. She has held leadership positions in K16 institutions and has led large-scale digital projects, interactive websites, and a business writing consultancy.

Learn more

CMMS Implementation
Blog Post

The Ultimate Guide to Successful CMMS Implementation

MaintainX Editorial Team
Dec 10, 2024
CMMS Benefits
Blog Post

20 CMMS Benefits: Transforming Maintenance Management in Modern Operations

MaintainX Editorial Team
Nov 29, 2024
Discover 5 key insights from Fabtech 2024 on cutting manufacturing downtime. From outdated systems to predictive maintenance, learn strategies to drive efficiency and growth.
Blog Post
Manufacturing

Manufacturing's $8,000-a-Minute Problem: 5 Key Insights from Fabtech 2024

Nick Haase
Nov 26, 2024
Digital transformation in a manufacturing environment using unified namespace to connect to the OT data
Blog Post
Manufacturing

The Crucial Role of Work Execution in Unified Namespace: Bridging Data and Action in Manufacturing

Nick Haase
Nov 25, 2024
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)—a powerful approach that can optimize operations and boost your bottom line.
Blog Post
Manufacturing

EAM to ROI: A Roadmap to Boosting Efficiency for Manufacturers

Nick Haase
Nov 19, 2024
An engineer uses a mobile device to access his CMMS, which has AI capabilities.
Blog Post
Manufacturing

From Factory Floor to AI Success: Why Frontline Workers Matter Most

Nick Haase
Nov 19, 2024
work order tracking
Blog Post

Work Order Tracking Guide

MaintainX Editorial Team
Nov 15, 2024
paperless work order system
Blog Post

Switching To Paperless Work Order Systems

MaintainX Editorial Team
Nov 15, 2024
An engineering tech performing work with a CMMS.
Blog Post
Manufacturing

Skilled Workers Wanted: A New Perspective on the Manufacturing Labor Gap

Nick Haase
Nov 15, 2024
Blog Post
Manufacturing

Digital Transformation in Action: Fuel Success with IIoT and Analytics

Chris Hutson
Nov 12, 2024
Blog Post

Preventive on Paper, Reactive in Practice: Closing the Gap Between Intention and Action

Nick Haase
Nov 5, 2024
Work Order Management Process
Blog Post

Understanding the Work Order Management Process

MaintainX Editorial Team
Sep 30, 2024
Work Order Prioritization
Blog Post

How To Prioritize Work Orders To Drive Efficiency

Sep 30, 2024
Maintenance Management Software
Blog Post

The Best Maintenance Management Software

Lekan Olanrewaju
Sep 11, 2024
Nov 7, 2024
MaintainX Asset Connect: Empowering OEMs, Exceeding Customer Expectations
Blog Post
Manufacturing

MaintainX Asset Connect: Empowering OEMs, Exceeding Customer Expectations

Chris Turlica, CEO and Co-Founder
Sep 3, 2024
MaintainX named a Leader in the IDC MarketScape
Blog Post
Manufacturing

MaintainX Named a Leader in IDC MarketScape: Worldwide SaaS CMMS Application 2024

Doug Roberge
Aug 28, 2024
An engineering technician in a control room.
Blog Post
Manufacturing

Fewer Outages, Higher Costs: The Unplanned Downtime Paradox

Nick Haase
Aug 26, 2024
Two men using MaintainX on a mobile device to input data for AI learning.
Blog Post

AI-Powered Maintenance: Creating a Foundation Today for Tomorrow’s Innovation

Nick Haase
Aug 12, 2024
Blog Post

How to Create a Digital Inventory Management System (and Never Stock Out Again)

Lekan Olanrewaju
Dec 11, 2023
Blog Post

AI in Maintenance: 5 Ways AI Can Improve Your Maintenance Strategy

Lekan Olanrewaju
Nov 7, 2023

Get more done with MaintainX

Screenshot of MaintainX application showing asset onlineScreenshot of MaintainX application in mobile app showing assets