Breakdown Maintenance: Definition, Types & Examples

What is Breakdown Maintenance?

Breakdown maintenance is a type of maintenance strategy where equipment or machinery is run until it fails. Repairs and replacements to the equipment are made at the time of failure. This approach is characterized by a lack of planned, preventive maintenance activities. It’s often referred to as reactive maintenance or corrective maintenance.

Key components of breakdown maintenance includes;

  • No scheduled interventions
  • Cost considerations
  • Limited planning
  • Shorter equipment lifespan
  • Unplanned downtime
  • Risk of safety incidents

Because breakdown maintenance cannot be scheduled in advance, companies need to be able to redirect resources toward repairs every time a piece of equipment fails. Ideally, whenever breakdown maintenance is necessary, company maintenance systems should be able to remedy the situation without coming to a complete halt. Of course, there is never a convenient time for downtime. Fixing inconvenient equipment malfunctions is an inevitable part of asset management. However, this type of maintenance can and should be minimized through strategic planning.

Types of Breakdown Maintenance

Implementing efficient stock and inventory management procedures is key to managing an effective breakdown program. Management teams must monitor the asset manufacturer’s guidelines, parts inventories, and backlog history to determine which equipment parts should always be kept on-premises for a rainy day. There are two main types of breakdown maintenance:

1. Run-to-Failure Maintenance

This type of maintenance refers to equipment failures that are expected to happen. Run-to-failure maintenance means the organization is prepared for a machine to stop working at some point in the near future. Ideal candidates for run-to-failure maintenance include assets that are:

  • Easy to replace and
  • Won’t jeopardize operational systems or personal safety.

In such instances, the cost of repairing the asset “on the fly” is less than the associated preventive maintenance costs. Run-to-failure maintenance should be reserved for inexpensive or unimportant parts and machinery.

2. Emergency Maintenance

Emergency maintenance is conducted when an important piece of equipment stops working unexpectedly and needs to be replaced immediately. In other words, this is the kind of maintenance no team wants to deal with!

Emergency breakdowns involve expensive costs, financial losses, and safety hazards. Because these equipment repairs must be conducted ASAP, it’s not unusual for companies to overspend on the expedited shipping of needed parts, outsourced technician assistance, and overtime costs.

Breakdown Maintenance Procedures

Most Breakdown Situations Follow a Similar Workflow:

  1. A maintenance operator detects an equipment issue and then alerts management by phone, email, or CMMS software.
  2. Management creates and assigns a work order for asset inspection.
  3. The assigned technician analyzes the problem and provides feedback on the expected time, parts, and costs associated with repair or replacement. If the equipment malfunction being evaluated cannot be replicated, this may lead to a significant waste of resources.
  4. If possible, the assigned maintenance worker fixes the issue.
  5. The worker restarts the machine to verify the correct performance.
  6. The issue is “closed” within a CMMS, spreadsheet, or paperwork order.

After maintenance is complete, the maintenance team may use the newly acquired information to track and prevent similar failures in the future as part of a preventive maintenance program. Additional parts or devices may be ordered and stocked to reduce the length of any future equipment downtime.

Examples of Breakdown Maintenance

Instances where breakdown maintenance makes sense are:

  • Non-critical equipment that is easily replaceable.
  • Parts that are either disposable, cheap, or easily available.
  • Assets with shorter life cycles.

This type of maintenance is often practiced in IT, factories, facility management, food service, hospitality, education, and many other industrial environments. However, the automotive and aerospace industries never rely on it for obvious safety reasons.

How Common is Breakdown Maintenance?

As Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) become more affordable, maintenance teams are increasingly adopting preventive maintenance (PM) programs to reduce downtime. Studies show that realistic PM strategies can save companies 12 to 18 percent in costs.

What Are the Pros and Cons of Breakdown Maintenance?

This type of maintenance has its merits when part of a comprehensive maintenance strategy. These potential advantages include:

Pros

  • Extended Component Life Cycles: If an asset component is beginning to show signs of wear without negatively impacting system performance, it may be fiscally prudent to use the part until breakdown.
  • Lowered Preventive Maintenance Costs: In some cases, when a component can be easily replaced, preventive maintenance can be more expensive than a breakdown maintenance strategy. Additionally, breakdown maintenance has no initial setup costs.

Nevertheless, a complete breakdown maintenance approach is considered to be a “high-risk” strategy. Major equipment breakdowns can have catastrophic effects on productivity, unnecessary costs, and customer dissatisfaction. The disadvantages of the strategy are:

Cons

  • Low Long-Term Cost-Efficiency: Using faulty equipment until it completely breaks down may increase energy costs.
  • Costly Fixes: Addressing an issue on an urgent basis typically costs more than scheduled downtime. Additionally, the financial losses associated with a breakdown, and with failing to meet output targets, can be considerable.
  • Decreased Asset Lifespan: Using asset components until failure may create a domino effect leading to decreased performance and total system failure.
  • Decreased Safety: When performing procedures under pressure, technicians may take shortcuts when it comes to safety measures.

What Are the Differences Between Breakdown Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, and Predictive Maintenance?

Breakdown maintenance may always be necessary due to the unpredictable nature of man-made machinery. However, the maintenance industry continues to shift toward preventive and predictive maintenance plans. Preventive maintenance (PM) dictates that potential asset vulnerabilities are addressed before they ever pose a problem. It involves using the manufacturer’s guidelines and asset history to schedule routine maintenance procedures.

Conversely, breakdown maintenance waits to resolve issues until they have become apparent. Predictive maintenance utilizes special tools that evaluate specific equipment usage to schedule maintenance procedures at cost-effective time frames prior to breakdown. Both predictive and preventive maintenance are proactive in nature, while breakdown maintenance is reactive.

Can Preventive Maintenance Eliminate All Breakdowns?

In a perfect world, yes. In real life, no. Both preventive and predictive maintenance reduce the risk of equipment breakdown. Nevertheless, unexpected equipment failures will happen, and the need for breakdown maintenance will always remain when it comes to machinery. However, busy maintenance teams can reduce stress by following standard operating procedures and maintenance best practices.

Breakdown Maintenance FAQs

How Can I Determine if Breakdown Maintenance Is Suitable for My Equipment?

Consider factors like budgets, the criticality of the equipment, its value, potential safety risks, and historical failure patterns. Conduct a cost-benefit analysis comparing breakdown maintenance to other maintenance strategies to determine the viability of a breakdown maintenance strategy. A common rule of thumb is to implement breakdown maintenance strategy for equipment that would cost more to maintain regularly than to fix upon failure.

Does Breakdown Maintenance Work for All Types of Equipment?

Breakdown maintenance is generally more suitable for simple or low-value equipment than critical assets. Critical or high-value equipment may require more preventive maintenance strategies to prevent costly asset failures.

How Can I Mitigate the Risks Associated With Breakdown Maintenance?

If you leverage a breakdown maintenance program, consider implementing robust safety procedures, keeping spare parts readily available, and having contingency plans in case of unexpected failures to reduce the risks associated with this program. You can also consider implementing maintenance management software to streamline breakdown maintenance tasks.

author photo
Ashley Gwilliam

See MaintainX in action

Take a live, one-on-one tour with a product expert to see how MaintainX can help you go paper-free and reduce costly unplanned downtime.
Book a Tour

Get more done with MaintainX

Screenshot of MaintainX application showing asset onlineScreenshot of MaintainX application in mobile app showing assets